I don't know who these folks are, but I stumbled on
a site hosting their talks so I decided to post them. It's a gamble, but we'll see if it pays off. In any case, I couldn't find the seventh deadly sin (Envy, btw) in their talks but I was able to find the other six. If they turn out to be any good, I'll post some more -- of course, you could always just beat me there and just get them yourself if you're impatient. Heh.
UPDATE: Apparently these priests are SSPX schismatics. Just so ya' know.
UPDADED UPDATE: The SSPX bishops are no longer formally excommunicated...they're just not in full communion yet.
Without further ado, here they are:
09/22/2002 | Sloth | Fr. John Fullerton | 2.8 MB | 24:35 |
06/30/2002 | Gluttony | Fr. Kenneth Dean | 3.4 MB | 29:19 |
06/23/2002 | Anger | Fr. Kenneth Dean | 1.8 MB | 15:22 |
04/07/2002 | Pride | Fr. Helmuts Libietis | 3.0 MB | 26:24 |
03/17/2002 | Greed | Fr. Kenneth Dean | 1.9 MB | 16:56 |
The sermons are pretty good but just FYI they are SSPX priests- they were recorded at St. Vincent De Paul SSPX Parish in KCMO
I'm listening to the sermon on sloth. Fr. Fullerton is effective in the sense that he gives specific instances I can relate with.
Well, whadaya know...only schismatics like SSPX gives great sermons like these.
I'll give them a listen, schismatics or not. They generally tend to be pretty good from a theological standpoint. The Doxs are schismatics as well, but their also a good source for sound teaching in these shakey times.
You might be interested to know that Cardinal Hoyos himself has said that SSPX is not in schism, but rather an irregular canonical situation. It is easy to beat people up with names and labels. Please, get the facts first. I have never in my life met holier or more devout priests than at my SSPX chapel. God bless you all.
The SSPX are not schismatics, just so ya' know...
It's not very nice to slander and spread lies. I hope that wasn't your intent. Maybe you were misinformed.
You're right - SSPX folks have not formally been declared schismatics. Formally, the founding bishops are excommunicates. The masses offered by the SSPX priests are valid but illicit.
As for the validity of SSPX marriages and sacraments of Confession, do take it up with Fr. Z -- he has the full skinny at his site with more official documentation that I care to delve into at the moment.
Suffice it to say, I'm not inclined to change the post at this moment.
God Bless, and do come home soon.
Ryan
I'm not an SSPX-er, but maybe now's a good time to edit this post? :-P
The SSPX are no longer in schism and even if they were, how does that make a difference in the quality of a sermon? The SSPX have a really solid grasp of some basic Catholic truths that have been obscured or forgotten in the wake of Vatican II. How many priests in your average Novus Ordo parish actually even preach about the deadly sins at all?
@Justin: Just trying to be up-front is all. Occasionally someone will say something in a talk that I'll miss, and I want to be as faithful to the Magisterium as I can. Forewarned is fore-armed.
But is it good? Yes. I wouldn't link to it if it wasn't worth linking.
God Bless,
Ryan
I wonder what kind of blog system you've been working on.
토토사이트링크
토토사이트
바카라사이트
카지노사이트
토토
스포츠토토핫