data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/561da/561da5d85ce46f21295ce6820b7cca9622bc748e" alt=""
2007/12/24 | Question and Answer |
| |
2007/12/17 | The Problem of Evil (Pt. 3) |
| |
2007/12/10 | The Problem of Evil (Pt. 2) |
| |
2007/12/03 | The Problem of Evil (Pt. 1) |
| |
2007/11/26 | Objections To Belief In God (Pt. 3) |
| |
2007/11/19 | Objections To Belief In God (Pt. 2) |
| |
2007/11/12 | Objections To Belief In God (Pt. 1) |
| |
2007/11/05 | Moral Argument (Pt. 4) |
| |
2007/10/29 | Moral Argument (Pt. 3) |
| |
2007/10/22 | Moral Argument (Pt. 2) |
| |
2007/10/15 | Moral Argument (Pt. 1) |
| |
2007/10/08 | Teleological Argument (Pt. 3) |
| |
2007/10/01 | Teleological Argument (Pt. 2) |
| |
2007/09/23 | Teleological Argument (Pt. 1) |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f853/6f8535e91eb642c9d750f93262209918eaa32432" alt=""
Better than Peter Kreeft?
Ahh...how could I forget Kreeft?!? He's also top-notch, but he doesn't do the nitty-gritty logical arguments the Craig does -- Kreeft's presentations are more insightful/wise/clever. He doesn't go into logical fallacies and I tend to think Craig's knowledge of cosmology is vastly superior.
Actually, now that I think about it, I pretty much hate Kreeft's articulation of the design argument...
But yeah, Kreeft is excellent, too.
God Bless,
Ryan