DISCLAIMER: Fred wrote in and wants us to know that while the old Gerry Matatics debates are a good listen, at minute 3:10 of the 7th audio (Matatics's Third Negative) Gerry Matatics brings out heretical traditionalist slant for about a minute and twenty seconds. Forewarned is forearmed:
| Introductory Remarks | Listen |
| Donahue's First Affirmative | Listen |
| Matatics's First Negative | Listen |
| Donahue's Second Affirmative | Listen |
| Matatics's Second Negative | Listen |
| Donahue's Third Affirmative | Listen |
| Matatics's Third Negative | Listen |
| Donahue's Rejoinder | Listen |
| Matatics's Rejoinder | Listen |
| Closing Remarks | Listen |
This blog is dedicated to bringing you free orthodox Catholic audio. If you have a tip or would like to report a broken link, please e-mail me by clicking the link above.
"Faith then cometh by hearing; and hearing by the word of Christ."
Rom 10:17(DRV)
Old Gerry Matatics debates are a good listen, however minute 3:10 of the 7th audio (Matatics's Third Negative) Gerry Matatics brings out heretical traditionalist slant for about a minute and twenty seconds. You probably should put a disclaimer. The rest is generally the same old arguments, but has a couple new arguments I haven't heard (on both sides).
Fred
Just another example of how Roman Catholicism refuses to acknowledge Protestantism and goes after anabaptist fringe groups that were not even allowed public assembly in Protestant nations. Gerry never addresses Duet 4 or Duet 12 nor the regulative principle 1. Because it was never mentioned by that imposter wanna be Protestant
2. Gerry does not address the defintion of sola scriptura as it is given in the historical reformed confessions. The definition is that the scripture is the sole rule of faith and practice AND WHATEVER MAY BE DEDUCED BY NECCESSARY INFERENCE FROM THE SCRIPTURE OR BY APOSTOLIC EXAMPLE. Gerry along with many romanists is good at making American relgion look bad. They never deal with the Puritans in Scotland during the 17th century or their regulatrive principle which is sola scriptura applied to worship. Gerry is American Clergy it is top be expected.
Mr. Shelton said:
The definition (of sola scriptura) is that the scripture is the sole rule of faith and practice AND WHATEVER MAY BE DEDUCED BY NECCESSARY INFERENCE FROM THE SCRIPTURE OR BY APOSTOLIC EXAMPLE.
And I am saying this statement is not found in Sacred Scripture. It’s a tradition of men that makes void the word of God.
Who’s “necessary inference” Mr. Shelton? Your’s? Your minister’s?
Who say’s what is and is not “Apostolic example”? Which “Protestantism” is correct in it’s interpretation?
With all due respect Mr. Shelton, your whole point is a self-contradiction.
"Fred wrote in and wants us to know that while the old Gerry Matatics debates are a good listen, at minute 3:10 of the 7th audio (Matatics's Third Negative) Gerry Matatics brings out heretical traditionalist slant for about a minute and twenty seconds."
the heretical traditionalist slant is?? what??